ANISOTROPIC SPACE DYNAMICS · CANONICAL THEORY

Space Dynamics Test Matrix

Six constraints, consistency checks and proposals, separating external observations from ASD differences still to be calculated.

Theory StatusTheory · EFFECTIVE MODEL
Mathematical ReviewMathematical review · CONDITIONAL
Overall Evidence StatusEvidence · UNTESTEDConstraints and proposals are recorded separately; no new experimental fit.
Canonical ASDYes · canonical theory baselineContinuum foundation; status specified per claim

01Classification and evidence status

CONSTRAINT records an external requirement, CONSISTENCY agreement in a specified limit, and PROPOSED TEST an unfinished proposal. Category differs from evidence status: an external observation does not mean an ASD calculation has been completed. No new REPRODUCED or DISCRIMINATING entry is claimed.

TestCategoryStatus
Transverse propagation speedCONSISTENCYCONSISTENT
Gravitational-wave and light arrival constraintCONSTRAINTUNTESTED
Free longitudinal spatial-wave searchPROPOSED TESTUNTESTED
Longitudinal–transverse conversionPROPOSED TESTUNTESTED
High-field nonlinearity constraintsCONSTRAINTUNTESTED
Directional metrological responsePROPOSED TESTUNTESTED

02Transverse propagation speed

CONSISTENCYEvidence · CONSISTENT

Transverse propagation speed

BIPM · SI base unit: metre
READY · Ready for stated work

Ready to recalculate the stated limited model; not a completed distinct prediction.

Observed result
The SI metre fixes the vacuum speed of light; the definition is not a measurement of ASD microscopic dynamics.
ASD calculation / interpretation
Match $K_T/\rho_s=c^2$ in the effective vacuum.
Established-theory result
Vacuum Maxwell theory has transverse radiation at light speed.
Numerically different?
No new numerical difference in the matched limit; coefficients are not independently derived.
Interpretation different?
Represents transverse radiation through spatial state variables.
Does this distinguish ASD?
NOT YET DISCRIMINATING · Matching does not select a microscopic model.
Current status
Consistency condition, not independent verification.
Required precision
Derive a deviation and observable before specifying sensitivity.

BIPM · SI base unit: metre

03Gravitational-wave and light arrival constraint

CONSTRAINTEvidence · UNTESTED

Gravitational-wave and light arrival constraint

LIGO / Virgo / Fermi / INTEGRAL · arXiv:1710.05834
NEEDS THEORY · Needs theory

Source, coupling, readout or statistical mapping remains open; instrument precision cannot replace it.

Observed result
GW170817 and GRB 170817A arrived 1.74±0.05 seconds apart; source-emission assumptions give a relative speed-difference bound of about −3×10⁻¹⁵ to 7×10⁻¹⁶.
ASD calculation / interpretation
An ASD mode representing observed gravitational waves must satisfy propagation and source constraints; that mapping is incomplete here.
Established-theory result
General relativity has tensor gravitational radiation; multimessenger observations constrain propagation.
Numerically different?
No independent ASD arrival-time calculation is supplied.
Interpretation different?
Longitudinal displacement and tensor polarization are different degrees of freedom.
Does this distinguish ASD?
NOT YET DISCRIMINATING · This is not detection of a free scalar longitudinal wave.
Current status
External propagation constraint; ASD mapping incomplete.
Required precision
Requires a joint source-delay, distance, propagation and detector analysis.

LIGO / Virgo / Fermi / INTEGRAL · arXiv:1710.05834

04Free longitudinal spatial-wave search

PROPOSED TESTEvidence · UNTESTED

Free longitudinal spatial-wave search

Ch. 5 §4.4 · OP-SD-005
NEEDS THEORY · Needs theory

Source, coupling, readout or statistical mapping remains open; instrument precision cannot replace it.

ASD-PRED-008
Observed result
No confirmed detection is included in this module.
ASD calculation / interpretation
Derive a distinctive readout from source, propagation and receiver coupling.
Established-theory result
Compare ordinary electromagnetic, mechanical, acoustic and thermal responses in the same configuration.
Numerically different?
Source strength and receiver coefficients are unspecified; no numerical prediction yet.
Interpretation different?
Proposed longitudinal channel, distinct from static fields and an unproved neutrino identification.
Does this distinguish ASD?
PROPOSED · Distinction awaits a unique response and independent parameters.
Current status
OP-SD-005 · Full proposal required.
Required precision
Pending transfer function and noise budget; no invented threshold.

05Longitudinal–transverse conversion

PROPOSED TESTEvidence · UNTESTED

Longitudinal–transverse conversion

Ch. 5 (5.4.19)–(5.4.21)
NEEDS THEORY · Needs theory

Source, coupling, readout or statistical mapping remains open; instrument precision cannot replace it.

ASD-PRED-008
Observed result
No specific ASD mode-conversion measurement is included.
ASD calculation / interpretation
Use reciprocal $g_{LT}$ coupling to calculate phase matching, background dependence and readout.
Established-theory result
Ordinary nonlinear optics and material effects can produce conversion backgrounds.
Numerically different?
No conversion rate from independent parameters.
Interpretation different?
Candidate exchange between spatial sectors; not automatically ordinary material mode conversion.
Does this distinguish ASD?
PROPOSED · Requires a feature separating conventional backgrounds.
Current status
OP-SD-001 / 006 · Coupling and sources remain open.
Required precision
Pending coefficients, coherence length, frequency and noise model.

06High-field nonlinearity constraints

CONSTRAINTEvidence · UNTESTED

High-field nonlinearity constraints

ATLAS · Observation of light-by-light scattering (2019)
NEEDS THEORY · Needs theory

Source, coupling, readout or statistical mapping remains open; instrument precision cannot replace it.

Observed result
ATLAS observed light-by-light scattering in ultraperipheral heavy-ion collisions.
ASD calculation / interpretation
A specific ASD interaction needs an independent calculation for the same cross section, energy range and polarization definitions.
Established-theory result
QED already includes this electromagnetic nonlinearity.
Numerically different?
No ASD cross-section difference or data fit is calculated here.
Interpretation different?
Additional L–T coupling must be separated from established QED effects.
Does this distinguish ASD?
NOT YET DISCRIMINATING · Not evidence of a free longitudinal wave.
Current status
External consistency constraint, not an ASD verification.
Required precision
First derive a quantitative deviation and systematic-error model for the same observable.

ATLAS · Observation of light-by-light scattering (2019)

07Directional metrological response

PROPOSED TESTEvidence · UNTESTED

Directional metrological response

Ch. 5 (5.1.3)–(5.1.11) · OP-SD-004
NEEDS THEORY · Needs theory

Source, coupling, readout or statistical mapping remains open; instrument precision cannot replace it.

ASD-PRED-001
Observed result
No directional anomaly dataset or new fit is supplied.
ASD calculation / interpretation
Compute directional frequency ratios or phases from the full microscopic model, including reference rulers and clocks.
Established-theory result
Include stress, temperature, motion, instrumental anisotropy and established-theory response.
Numerically different?
The FCC scalar second moment can be isotropic; higher-order dispersion is not directly an instrument signal.
Interpretation different?
Candidate microscopic directionality requires continuum and detector mappings.
Does this distinguish ASD?
PROPOSED · No distinguishing quantitative prediction yet.
Current status
OP-SD-004 / 005 · Microscopic-to-readout connection pending.
Required precision
Pending scale, directional terms, reference cancellation and noise budget.

08Next data work

Fix parameters and observables before specifying source, propagation, reception and noise. Null results should give model-dependent exclusions. Continue through OP-SD-005 and OP-SD-006。

Canonical Source

Anisotropic Space Dynamics

Chapter 4 / 第四章 · Chapter 5 / 第五章

Ch. 4 §4.1; Ch. 5 §§4, 6

Module version
1.0.0
Source snapshot
SD-51779505a476
Content review date
2026-09-15
Source files and checksums

The snapshot hash identifies the source manifest; each source file has its own checksum below.

  • CH4-9587f3c44d39 · 第四章-ASD空间本体论-出版整理稿.docx
    DOCX
    9587f3c44d3974f44e387ed03d92691fa5473a90d7b1c9c989155adf0622849a
  • CH5-ca737ec4e327 · 第五章-出版整理稿.docx
    DOCX
    ca737ec4e327d72c5507bbc8e00295b6e56029c7583ebad8e505cdb9c68c6262

Download source manifest

Prepared from the final Chinese manuscripts identified above. A public reading link for the full manuscript has not yet been released.

RELATIONSHIP INDEX

Position within the framework

These links index inputs and research relationships. The completion status of each derivation is specified in its text. Untranslated supporting pages open in Chinese.

RESEARCH LEDGER

Revision history

SOURCE & SCOPE

Chapter 4 / 第四章 · Chapter 5 / 第五章 · Ch. 4 §4.1; Ch. 5 §§4, 6

This is the English translation of the Chinese canonical module, based on the same final-manuscript source snapshot. The Chinese final manuscript remains authoritative. Website equation IDs are stable citation identifiers; original manuscript numbers are listed separately.

Knowledge scope
CITATION & SOURCE FILE

ASD: Space Dynamics Test Matrix. ASD-SD--TESTS-SPACE-DYNAMICS-EN. Version 1.0.0; 2026-09-15. https://asd-physics.org/en/tests/space-dynamics. Ch. 4 §4.1; Ch. 5 §§4, 6. Source SD-51779505a476.

Discuss this page Download this page as MDX
CONTINUE RESEARCH

Continue with the assumptions, equations and sources.

These links carry this page and its source version into the research workspace. Each request pins its knowledge snapshot. Model availability is shown in the workspace; retrieval and private export remain available.