ANISOTROPIC SPACE DYNAMICS · OPEN RESEARCH

Global Prediction Registry

Stable Prediction IDs separate shared results, candidate differences and closed predictions, with device and data gaps explicit.

RESEARCH PROGRAM · v1.0

Registry and comparison planning; no new canonical physical result or closed quantitative discriminator.

01Registry

11 / 11 records

ASD-PRED-001NEEDS THEORY · Needs theory

Directional atomic-clock response

Research this claim

CANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator

Observable
Differential fractional synchronous clock ratio versus axis orientation or sidereal time.
ΔO
ΔO is not established; no 10⁻¹² amplitude is assigned.
Status / device calculation
PROPOSED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
ASD prediction
Unknown: transition, reference-clock and transfer responses must be derived independently; geometry alone is not a frequency shift.
Comparison prediction
Clock ratio under the fixed protocol, including magnetic, thermal, kinematic, gravitational and transfer corrections; no unmodelled directional term.
Experimental configuration
Fix species, transition, quantization axis, latitude, background direction, starting sidereal phase, cadence, reference and transfer link.
Required precision
Derive amplitude/frequency first; determine test power from covariance and sampling window.
Systematic effects
Zeeman, blackbody, Stark, second-order Doppler, gravitational potential, servo, rotation-correlated magnetic field, transfer and solar-day aliasing.
Existing data
Published clock-ratio and Lorentz-symmetry tests exist; no raw time series for this ASD configuration is loaded.
Falsification criterion
Preregister a nonzero modulation with independently fixed parameters and likelihood. If calibrated confidence intervals exclude it, constrain that clock-specific LVE-to-readout mapping.
Code / data
Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Inspect exclusion scope

Download reproducibility kit

Open workbenchDiscuss this record
ASD-PRED-002NEEDS THEORY · Needs theory

Muon survival and counts under LVE

Research this claim

CANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator

Observable
N(E,θ) and joint upper/lower station count ratios for the same production spectrum and acceptance.
ΔO
ASD hazard is undefined, so ΔN is not calculated.
Status / device calculation
PROPOSED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
Equation dependencies
ASD-WEB-LVE-017ASD-WEB-LVE-018
ASD prediction
Chapter 1 Eqs. (1.45)–(1.46) give the illustrative path L=643√999 m≈20323.3 m from approximate inputs. Survival still requires an independently specified decay law, production and energy spectra, propagation and detector acceptance.
Comparison prediction
P=exp[−∫ds/(βγcτμ)], folded with energy loss, production distributions, efficiency and migration.
Experimental configuration
Fix spectrum, production altitude, zenith, material, livetime, geometric acceptance, threshold and energy reconstruction.
Required precision
Depends on ΔN, count statistics and shared normalization; not inferred from one path example.
Systematic effects
Atmospheric temperature/pressure, hadronic production, energy loss, trigger, dead time, background and spectrum–acceptance degeneracy.
Existing data
PDG provides a cosmic-ray review and references; acceptance-qualified bin data are not yet imported.
Falsification criterion
With statistical mapping, production model and calibration fixed, a joint likelihood excludes N_ASD; the immediate target is that path-to-decay mapping.
Code / data
Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Inspect exclusion scope

Download reproducibility kit

Open workbenchDiscuss this record
ASD-PRED-003NEEDS THEORY · Needs theory

High-γ charge-field detector readout

Research this claim

CANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator

Observable
Normalized electro-optic differential signal S(t), or independently calibrated V(t).
ΔO
ΔS(t) is unavailable; a standard field curve cannot be relabelled ASD.
Status / device calculation
PROPOSED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
ASD prediction
High-speed source field, laboratory mapping and crystal response are not jointly closed.
Comparison prediction
Maxwell–Lorentz signal for the same bunch, boundary, dielectric, laser and detector.
Experimental configuration
Beam energy, bunch density, impact parameter, conductor boundary, crystal orientation/thickness, laser width, sampling and calibration.
Required precision
Set by response-filtered ΔS and time-domain covariance, not by an ideal point-field peak.
Systematic effects
Phase matching, crystal bandwidth, multiple reflections, beam irradiation, timing jitter, gain and background.
Existing data
Ota et al. (2022) is published; its data/code statement requires a reasonable request to the authors. Neither is acquired here.
Falsification criterion
With common inputs and independently fixed gain, test the full waveform and covariance; reject the specified source–probe construction.
Code / data
Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Inspect exclusion scope

Download reproducibility kit

Open workbenchDiscuss this record
ASD-PRED-004NEEDS DATA · Needs data

S301 candidate orbital case

Research this claim

CANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator

Observable
Epoch astrometry and radial velocity where applicable.
ΔO
Within the chosen static exterior construction that has the Schwarzschild form, neither higher order nor strong field alone establishes a nonzero difference. Specify a justified different constitutive or source input, then calculate the same apparatus observable and error budget.
Status / device calculation
DATA-GATED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
Equation dependencies
ASD-WEB-GRV-024ASD-WEB-GRV-032
ASD prediction
Pending object identification, inputs and joint fit; the current spherical exterior model may be equivalent.
Comparison prediction
Standard orbital fit with the same coordinates, mass, distance and selection.
Experimental configuration
Epochs, time scale, astrometry, RV, errors, covariance, reference frame and instrument calibration.
Required precision
Pending a nondegenerate difference and parameter covariance.
Systematic effects
Reference-frame drift, RV zero point, distance/mass degeneracy, extended mass and source confusion.
Existing data
DATA-GATED: object verification and raw epoch data are missing.
Falsification criterion
After all data gates pass, test the fixed gravity construction in joint observation space; record non-discrimination if equivalent.
Code / data
Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Inspect exclusion scope

Download reproducibility kit

Open workbenchDiscuss this record
ASD-PRED-005READY · Ready for stated work

Static gravitational redshift

Research this claim

REINTERPRETED · Shared observable, different interpretation

Observable
Two-clock frequency ratio under a common reference.
ΔO
Equivalent within the stated static model: ΔO=0, not a distinct prediction.
Status / device calculation
NON-DISCRIMINATING / LIMITED MODEL
Full protocol and falsification criterion
Equation dependencies
ASD-WEB-GRV-009ASD-WEB-TIME-006
ASD prediction
The stated static scale construction gives the corresponding frequency ratio.
Comparison prediction
GR frequency ratio for the same static background and protocol.
Experimental configuration
Static source, clock positions, common reference and transfer protocol.
Required precision
Greater precision cannot distinguish identical functions.
Systematic effects
Height, background potential, clock offsets and transfer.
Existing data
Primary references are in the gravity matrix; no new fit is claimed.
Falsification criterion
A discrepancy constrains shared static-model and apparatus assumptions, not specifically the ASD interpretation.
Code / data
Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Inspect exclusion scope

Download reproducibility kit

Discuss this record
ASD-PRED-006READY · Ready for stated work

Weak-field deflection and delay

Research this claim

REPRODUCED · Reproduced result

Observable
Ray deflection angle and fixed-endpoint propagation delay.
ΔO
ΔO=0 at the checked order; no independent higher-order difference is established.
Status / device calculation
NON-DISCRIMINATING / LIMITED MODEL
Full protocol and falsification criterion
Equation dependencies
ASD-WEB-GRV-016ASD-WEB-GRV-021
ASD prediction
Standard coefficients recovered in the stated approximation.
Comparison prediction
GR result at the same order, geometry, mass and coordinates.
Experimental configuration
Weak static background, fixed endpoints and a shared impact parameter.
Required precision
A nondegenerate difference must be established first; no distinct precision target here.
Systematic effects
Media delay, source motion, orbit, mass and calibration.
Existing data
Gravity-matrix primary references retained; no refit.
Falsification criterion
Tests the optical limit; common failure also requires checking shared inputs.
Code / data
Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Inspect exclusion scope

Download reproducibility kit

Discuss this record
ASD-PRED-007READY · Ready for stated work

Standard parallel moving-charge configuration

Research this claim

REINTERPRETED · Shared observable, different interpretation

Observable
Force on co-moving parallel charges at a defined transverse separation.
ΔO
A shared result when operational definitions agree; general source/probe extension remains open.
Status / device calculation
NON-DISCRIMINATING / LIMITED MODEL
Full protocol and falsification criterion
Equation dependencies
ASD-WEB-EM-010ASD-WEB-EM-006
ASD prediction
LVE magnetic-force algebra under the stated distance/force definitions.
Comparison prediction
Maxwell–Lorentz total force for the same configuration.
Experimental configuration
Equal speeds, parallel motion, transverse separation; specify force–distance coordinate pairing.
Required precision
This configuration provides no distinct difference from which to infer precision.
Systematic effects
Distance calibration, beam profile, carrier speed and coordinate conventions.
Existing data
Algebraic comparison is documented; this is not a high-speed EO fit.
Falsification criterion
Test the specified force-to-readout mapping; this setup does not exclude every general-field candidate.
Code / data
Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Inspect exclusion scope

Download reproducibility kit

Discuss this record
ASD-PRED-008NEEDS THEORY · Needs theory

Free longitudinal spatial-wave detection

Research this claim

CANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator

Observable
Polarization, phase and frequency/length response in a specified source and detector.
ΔO
No measurable amplitude difference yet.
Status / device calculation
PROPOSED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
Equation dependencies
No equation set yet closes this observable; see source pages.
ASD prediction
Free longitudinal modes are a research target; source strength and detector coupling are undetermined.
Comparison prediction
Common acoustic, thermal, electromagnetic and instrumental background model.
Experimental configuration
Specify excitation, shielding, coupling, polarization and distance scans.
Required precision
Depends on source strength, coupling and noise spectrum.
Systematic effects
Mechanical/acoustic propagation, thermal drift, EM crosstalk and ground vibration.
Existing data
No dedicated free spatial-longitudinal-wave detection dataset is published here.
Falsification criterion
A null result constrains a longitudinal-mode candidate only after nonzero detector coupling is fixed; GW speed is not a longitudinal-mode detection.
Code / data
Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Inspect exclusion scope

Download reproducibility kit

Discuss this record
ASD-PRED-009NEEDS THEORY · Needs theory

Particle mass spectrum from shared inputs

Research this claim

CANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator

Observable
Electron/proton mass ratio and responses associated with the same solutions.
ΔO
Not calculated; particle-by-particle tuning is not a prediction.
Status / device calculation
PROPOSED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
Equation dependencies
No equation set yet closes this observable; see source pages.
ASD prediction
Complete stable solutions and a spectrum from shared constants are missing.
Comparison prediction
Measured masses and established particle phenomenology as requirements.
Experimental configuration
First fix action, solution sectors, calibration observables, units and shared parameters.
Required precision
Establish theoretical/numerical errors before comparing measurement uncertainty.
Systematic effects
Model truncation, mesh/boundary effects, solution error and calibration reuse.
Existing data
The matter matrix lists experimental requirements; no ASD mass-spectrum dataset exists here.
Falsification criterion
Exclude the specified topology realization if a fixed model fails masses/responses outside its calibration set.
Code / data
Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Inspect exclusion scope

Download reproducibility kit

Discuss this record
ASD-PRED-010NEEDS THEORY · Needs theory

Single-particle quantum apparatus discriminator

Research this claim

CANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator

Observable
Event-distribution difference for identical preparation, boundaries and detection protocol.
ΔO
ΔP is not established; Born statistics cannot be a hidden ASD input.
Status / device calculation
PROPOSED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
Equation dependencies
No equation set yet closes this observable; see source pages.
ASD prediction
Effective envelopes and conditional intensities exist; a distinct event distribution is not derived.
Comparison prediction
Standard single-particle quantum model including the same detector response.
Experimental configuration
Fix source, paths, surface potentials, environment, detector and event definition.
Required precision
Depends on nondegenerate differences and count statistics.
Systematic effects
Decoherence, efficiency, thresholds, background, drift and postselection.
Existing data
Known quantum experiments are phenomenological requirements; no distinct ASD fit here.
Falsification criterion
Exclude a fixed core–field–detector coupling; report non-discrimination if it only recovers the standard relation.
Code / data
Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Inspect exclusion scope

Download reproducibility kit

Discuss this record
ASD-PRED-011READY · Ready for stated work

Rotating-loop area term

Research this claim

REPRODUCED · Reproduced result

Observable
Counter-propagating time difference or calibrated phase difference.
ΔO
ΔO=0 at the checked order.
Status / device calculation
NON-DISCRIMINATING / LIMITED MODEL
Full protocol and falsification criterion
Equation dependencies
ASD-WEB-LVE-015ASD-WEB-LVE-016
ASD prediction
Area term obtained within the stated rotating-loop approximation.
Comparison prediction
Standard Sagnac relation for the same configuration and order.
Experimental configuration
Closed loop, area vector, angular velocity and medium.
Required precision
A shared term alone cannot set a discriminating precision.
Systematic effects
Loop deformation, backscatter, dispersion and readout offset.
Existing data
Sources are retained in the LVE matrix; no new apparatus result.
Falsification criterion
Tests the shared area term; failure does not automatically select an alternative interpretation.
Code / data
Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Inspect exclusion scope

Download reproducibility kit

Discuss this record

02Four categories and promotion criteria

CategoryMinimum meaningDiscrimination
REPRODUCEDKnown result recovered under stated conditionsNo
REINTERPRETEDSame observable with a different physical interpretationNo
CANDIDATE DISCRIMINATORA worthwhile possible difference; device closure incompleteNot yet
QUANTITATIVE DISCRIMINATORBoth readouts, difference, domain, errors and identifiability are specifiedConditional

Promotion requires a reproducible ΔO=OASD−Ocomparison\Delta O=O_{\rm ASD}-O_{\rm comparison} under common inputs and readout definitions. Different internal fields, adjustable amplitudes, published anomalies or better precision alone do not qualify. Matter and Quantum phenomenological requirements remain in their original matrices; they do not automatically become reproduced results.

03Identifiers, versions and review

IDs are retained permanently. Withdrawal or merger requires a reason and successor ID; old IDs are not recycled. Expand a record to inspect its sources, dependencies, protocol and exclusion scope. The downloadable JSON registry shares the page's data source; see the source manifest.

RELATIONSHIP INDEX

Position within the framework

These links index inputs and research relationships. The completion status of each derivation is specified in its text. Untranslated supporting pages open in Chinese.

RESEARCH LEDGER

Revision history

SOURCE & SCOPE

Existing canonical module snapshots / 现有正式模块快照 · Predictions & Falsification v1.0 · review 2026-09-22

Download source and scope manifest

Based on versioned canonical modules and cited instrument literature. This experimental program adds operational templates, not new canonical field equations.

Knowledge scope
CITATION & SOURCE FILE

ASD: Global Prediction Registry. ASD-EXP-TESTS-PREDICTIONS-EN. Version 1.0.0; 2026-09-22. https://asd-physics.org/en/tests/predictions. Predictions & Falsification v1.0 · review 2026-09-22. Source EXP-7ca61744dcd2.

Discuss this page Download this page as MDX
CONTINUE RESEARCH

Continue with the assumptions, equations and sources.

These links carry this page and its source version into the research workspace. Each request pins its knowledge snapshot. Model availability is shown in the workspace; retrieval and private export remain available.